References

1. 1. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W. et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990. V. 215 (3). P. 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836 (05)80360-2
2. 2. Ballard R. Bidens pilosa complex (Asteraceae) in North and Central America. Amer. J. Bot. 1986. V. 73. P. 1452–1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1986.tb10891
3. 3. Bauer R., Begerow D., Nagler A. et al. The Georgefischeriales: a phylogenetic hypothesis. Mycol. Res. 2001. V. 105 (4). P. 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756201003690
4. 4. Begerow D., Lutz M., Oberwinkler F. Implications of molecular characters for the phylogeny of the genus Entyloma. Mycol. Res. 2002. V. 106 (12). P. 1392–1399. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756202006962
5. 5. Capella-­Gutiérrez S., Silla-­Martinéz J.M., Gabaldón T. TrimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-­scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009. V. 25 (15). P. 1972–1973. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348
6. 6. De Bary A. Protomyces microsporus und seine Verwandten. Bot. Zeitung. 1874. V. 32. P. 97–108.
7. 7. Denchev T.T., Denchev C.M., Kemler M. et al. Entyloma eranthidis sp. nov. on Eranthis longistipitata from Uzbekistan. 2021. Mycotaxon. V. 136 (2). P. 373–385. https://doi.org/10.5248/136.373
8. 8. Denchev T.T., Denchev C.M., Shivas R.G. Two new Entyloma species (Entylomatales) from USA. Mycobiota. 2013. V. 3. P. 35–39. https://doi.org/10.12664/mycobiota.2013.03.04
9. 9. Gardes M., Bruns T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molec. Ecology. 1993. V. 2 (2). P. 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x
10. 10. Guindon S., Dufayard J.F., Lefort V. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-­likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic biology. 2010. V. 59 (3). P. 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
11. 11. Katoh K., Rozewicki J., Yamada K.D. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform. 2019. V. 20 (4). P. 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108
12. 12. Kruse J., Piątek M., Lutz M. et al. Broad host range species in specialised pathogen groups should be treated with suspicion – a case study on Entyloma infecting Ranunculus. Persoonia. 2018. V. 41. P. 175–201. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2018.41.09
13. 13. Kruse J., Thines M. Entyloma lagoeciae: a new smut fungus occurring on the annual Apiaceae Lagoecia cuminoides, Nova Hedwigia. 2019. V. 108 (1–2). P. 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2018/0503
14. 14. Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016. V. 33 (7). P. 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
15. 15. Lanfear R., Calcott B., Ho S.Y. et al. Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular biology and evolution. 2012. V. 29 (6). P. 1695–1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss020
16. 16. Lanfear R., Frandsen P.B., Wright A.M. et al. Finder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017. V. 34 (3). P. 772–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
17. 17. Lutz M., Piątek M. Phylogenetic placement, DNA barcoding, morphology and evidence for the spreading of Entyloma cosmi. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2016. V. 145. P. 857–869.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-0874-1
18. 18. Patouillard N. Contributions à la flore mycologique du Tonkin. Journal de Botanique. 1890. V. 4 (3). P. 53–60.
19. 19. Patouillard N. Contributions а la flore mycologique du Tonkin (3’ serie). J. Bot.. 1897. V. 11 (22–23). P. 367–374.
20. 20. Piepenbring M. New and poorly known smut fungi in Cuba. Mycol. Res. 1999. V. 103 (4). P. 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756298007370
21. 21. Piximètre. La mesure de dimensions sur images. 2020. http://www.piximetre.fr
22. 22. Rambaut A., Drummond A.J., Xie D. et al. Posterior summarization in bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biol. 2018. V. 67 (5). P. 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
23. 23. Richter C., Yurkov A.M., Boekhout T. et al. Diversity of Tilletiopsis-like fungi in Exobasidiomycetes (Ustilaginomycotina) and description of six novel species. Front. Microbiol. 2019. V. 10. (online). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02544
24. 24. Rojas-­Sandoval J. Bidens pilosa (blackjack). CABI Compendium. 9148. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.9148
25. 25. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biol. 2012. V. 61 (3). P. 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
26. 26. Rooney-­Latham S., Lutz M., Blomquist C.L. et al. Entyloma helianthi: identification and characterization of the causal agent of sunflower white leaf smut. Mycologia. 2017. V. 109 (3). P. 520–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2017.1362314
27. 27. Savchenko K.G., Carris L.M., Castlebury L.A. et al. Revision of Entyloma (Entylomatales, Exobasidiomycetes) on Eryngium. Mycologia. 2014. V. 106 (4). P. 797–810. https://doi.org/10.3852/13-317
28. 28. Savchenko K.G., Carris L.M., Castlebury L.A. et al. Entyloma scandicis, a new smut fungus on Scandix verna from Mediterranean forests of Israel. Mycotaxon. 2015. V. 130 (4). P. 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.5248/130.1061
29. 29. Savchenko K.G., Carris L.M. Two new Entyloma (Entylomataceae, Basidiomycota) species on North American Sanicula. Phytotaxa. 2017. V. 327 (2). P. 191–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.327.2.8
30. 30. Savile D.B.O. A study of the species of Entyloma on North American Composites. Canad. J. Res. Sect. C, Bot. Sci. 1947. V. 25. P. 105–120.
31. 31. Shivas R.G., Vánky K., Vánky C. et al. An annotated check list of Ustilaginomycetes in Papua New Guinea. Australasian Plant Pathol. 2001. V. 30 (3). P. 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1071/AP01029
32. 32. Spegazzini C. Fungi Guaranitici. I. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina. 1884. V. 17 (3). P. 119–134.
33. 33. Stamatakis A. RAxML–VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-­based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2006. V. 22 (21). P. 2688–2690. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446
34. 34. Trịnh T.K., Bảo T.T.T. Large variety of Vietnamese mushrooms and their resource value. Science Report First National Conference Vietnam Nature Museum system. Ha Noi, 2011. P. 97–104.
35. 35. Trịnh T.K., Đang V.T., Hà M.T. Class Ustomycetes-­charcoal bushings. In: list of plants of Vietnam: V. 1. Agriculture. National University of Hanoi. Resource and Environmental Center. Ha Noi. 2001, pp. 226–229.
36. 36. Vánky K. Taxonomical studies on Ustilaginales. XXIII. Mycotaxon. 2003. V. 85. P. 1–65.
37. 37. Vánky K., Lutz M. Entyloma majewskii sp. nov. (Entylomataceae) on Ranunculus ficaria from Iran. Polish Bot. J. 2010. V. 55 (2). P. 271–279.
38. 38. Vánky K. Smut fungi of the world. APS Press, St. Paul, 2012.
39. 39. Vánky K., Vánky C., Denchev C. Smut fungi in Africa – a check-list. Mycol. Balcanica. 2011. V. 8. P. 1–77.
40. 40. White T.J., Bruns T.D., Lee S.B. et al. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: M.A. Innis etc. (eds). PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications, Academic Press, N.Y., 1990, pp. 315–322.
41. 41. Zambettakis C. Recherches sur les Ustilaginales d’Afrique. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France. 1970. V. 86. P. 305–692.